The Biopsychosocial Model and Perinatal Health Care: Determinants of Perinatal Care in a Community Sample.

Insufficient care in the perinatal period is associated with poorer maternal health, poorer perinatal outcomes, infant mortality, and health inequalities. Identifying the sources of and reducing the rates of insufficient care is therefore a major clinical and public health objective. We propose a specific application of the biopsychosocial model that conceptualizes prenatal and postpartum care quality as health markers that are influenced by psychological factors and family and social context. Clinic attendance data were abstracted from the electronic medical records of N = 291 participants enrolled in a longitudinal pregnancy cohort study of healthy women who have been followed since the first trimester; the Kotelchuck Index (KI) was calculated as an index of perinatal care utilization. Detailed prenatal psychological, social, and sociodemographic data were collected from self-report questionnaire and interview. Bivariate analyses indicated socio-demographic (e.g., race), psychological (e.g., response to perceived racism, affective symptoms, trauma experience), and social and family context (e.g., social support, family size) significantly influenced pre- and post-natal care utilization. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, adjusting for medical complications, identified social and family context as robust predictors of perinatal care utilization. The findings underscore the need for biopsychosocial models of health care and highlight several potential strategies for improving health care utilization.

Associations Between Historically Redlined Districts and Racial Disparities in Current Obstetric Outcomes.

Importance: Despite much higher health care expenditure than comparable countries, striking racial and ethnic disparities exist in obstetric outcomes in the United States. A multifaceted exploration of the factors influencing these disparities, including the legacy of structural racism, is important to improve health outcomes for all. Objective: To characterize the association of the historic racially discriminatory home loan practice of redlining with disparities in modern obstetric outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study of a 9-county birth certificate database in the Finger Lakes region of New York state from 2005 to 2018, modern obstetric outcomes were matched with regions classified by the federal government for mortgage loan servicing based on racially discriminatory criteria from the 1940 Home Owners' Loan Corporation map (HOLC; also known as the redline map). Patients with a live birth recorded in the data system with a recorded home zip code within the historic HOLC categories were included. Data were analyzed from July to December 2019. Exposure: Regions previously categorized by historic, racially discriminatory criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures: Each HOLC area was analyzed for the primary outcome of preterm birth and secondary outcomes of obstetric and medical complications, with logistic regression to address regional and patient-level covariates. Results: From 2005 until 2018, there were 64 804 live births within the 15 zip codes overlaying historic HOLC regions. Prevalence of preterm birth increased with decreasing HOLC categories, from the lowest overall preterm birth rate of 217 of 2873 births (7.55%) in the zip code historically defined as "Best" or "Still Desirable" and the highest overall preterm birth rate of 427 of 3449 births (12.38%) in the zip code historically defined as "Hazardous." These associations with preterm birth remained significant in logistic regression controlling for poverty levels and educational attainment (adjusted odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.08-1.97) and parental race (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.25-1.53). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the linkage of historic and modern community data sets with an obstetric data set offered the opportunity to characterize modern obstetric disparities associated with a system of historic inequity. The persistence of these findings after correcting for contemporary community socioeconomic characteristics suggest potential influences of a system of profound structural inequity that ripple forward in time, with impacts that extend beyond measurable socioeconomic inequity.

Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of handheld point-of-care ultrasound testing for gynecologic pathology: a pilot study for use in low resource settings.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POC-US) is a diagnostic test conducted at the site of patient care with direct interpretation by the clinician, providing immediate results. POC-US for gynecologic application is not well characterized by current literature yet has the potential to increase access in limited resource settings. We compared the diagnostics of three POC-US devices for gynecologic (GYN) pathology and then performed evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of a single best POC-US device for intended use in a low resource setting. METHODS: This is prospective, pilot descriptive study of 60 subjects. In part 1, comparison of three POC-US devices was performed. Twenty subjects underwent POC-US with three test units [GE Vscan (Vscan), Sonosite Iviz (Iviz), Philips Lumify (Lumify)] followed by diagnostic ultrasound (Dx-US) for reference imaging. Image quality and correlation for devices was scored by blinded reviewers and quantitative measurements of GYN pathology were compared. In part 2, forty subjects underwent POC-US validation with the highest scoring device (Lumify) and Dx-US for reference imaging. Concordance of POC-US operator-interpreted diagnosis with reference imaging interpretation were assessed by Cohen's unweighted kappa coefficient. Accuracy and agreement of POC-US were assessed by linear regression and Bland-Altman plot analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of POC-US for gynecologic pathologies were calculated. RESULTS: In aggregate qualitative measurements, Lumify and Iviz units performed superiorly to Vscan. There was no statistically significant difference in quantitative measurements between devices, but a trend towards lower mean error was seen for Lumify and Iviz as compared to Vscan. Lumify device had highest overall scoring and was selected for further testing. In validation comparison of Lumify to Dx-US, no statistically significant differences were found for measurements of endometrium, uterus, ovaries, adnexal pathology, or leiomyomata, (P < 0.02) with excellent agreement in operator-interpreted diagnosis (Kappa > 0.7). Sensitivity and specificity of detecting pathology was 80-100% with PPV and NPV 76-100%. CONCLUSION: Among three POC-US devices, Lumify and Iviz devices show highest potential for successful application to clinical gynecologic ultrasound. Clinician-performed POC-US has high diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for basic GYN anatomy and pathology. POC-US is an acceptable and feasible diagnostic tool with potential for future application in a low resource setting to increase access to ultrasound.

Ultrasound Assessment of the Intrauterine Device.

As the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) has expanded in the United States, both as a highly effective form of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and as a tool for effective management of other gynecologic conditions, effective imaging of IUDs has become increasingly important. Ultrasound is a cost-effective, accurate, safe, and accessible imaging solution for the assessment of IUDs. This article explores the role of ultrasound in evaluation of IUDs as well as the literature regarding ultrasound guidance for device placement. It also examines the evaluation and management of IUDs with a concurrent intrauterine pregnancy.

Discontinuity of Breastfeeding Care: "There's No Captain of the Ship".

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding rates in the United States are suboptimal. Health professionals (HPs) have a unique opportunity to support breastfeeding because of the frequency and timing of their visits with mothers and infants as well as their call by professional organizations to do so. The objective of this study was to understand HPs' perceived roles and experiences with providing breastfeeding-related care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 34 HPs (obstetricians, midwives, pediatricians, nurses, and lactation consultants) who care for pregnant or lactating women. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and verified for accuracy; content analysis was used to identify themes using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The overarching theme was discontinuity in breastfeeding care across the continuum. Most HPs relied on other HPs to provide breastfeeding care, which resulted from and contributed to problematic gaps in care that were reported. A minority of HPs attempted to bridge gaps in breastfeeding care or improve continuity. Contributing to the discontinuity were a lack of time, lack of skills, inconsistent messages, and low communication across stages of care. HPs were unsure whether their help was effective and whether required follow-up was completed. CONCLUSIONS: Despite HPs' recognition of breastfeeding as the best choice for infant feeding, breastfeeding care may be disjointed and a barrier to achieving breastfeeding recommendations. These problems should be investigated and systemically addressed in future research so that maternal-infant dyad breastfeeding care can be improved.

Training for percutaneous umbilical blood sampling during Maternal Fetal Medicine fellowship in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rates of percutaneous umbilical blood sampling(PUBS) training in United States Maternal Fetal Medicine (MFM) fellowships. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an online survey of MFM fellows in all 3 years of fellowship regarding their PUBS training experience. RESULTS: Of the 143 surveys, 87 (61%) were completed. The median number of PUBS performed was 1 (range 0-50) with a median of 5 (range 0-50) expected to be performed by fellowship completion. In all, 75 (86%) plan on performing PUBS after completion of fellowship. Of those, 53 (71%) do not expect to perform as many PUBS as they themselves consider the minimum number to achieve competency. There appears to regional variation in training opportunities. CONCLUSION: Training for PUBS in MFM fellowships appears to be limited in many portions of the country. Most fellows planning on performing PUBS in practice will not have performed the self-described minimum number needed for competence during fellowship.